So, after briefly addressing why it was also a no-go for Clojure, Haskell, and Scala, Biggar tackles why the increasingly trendy Rust didn’t end up as the language of choice, as he had once expected. Right now, if you implement a Rust trait. of the form a.foo(b). The dev-environment-setup experience with Rust is amazing. assuming struct Point { x: i32, y: 32}, you can do let Point { x, .. } = p;). Scala’s doesn’t give its users the same level of control, so naturally there is some adjustment to be made. Scala and Kotlin are the two contenders for the Java throne. I’m from web development background. Kotlin vs. Scala: Which is Right JVM for 2020? As a Scala developer of many years, I started getting into Rust out of frustration with Scala and the JVM, working on in-memory databases and high performance data manipulation code. I was just curious if you ran your code using Scala Spark if you would see a performance difference. Side-by-side comparison of Scala and Rust. Scala is a powerful language with highly-advantages features and flexible syntax. What is the best programming language to write an operating system? Even for seasoned programmers it's a difficult language. I actually wrote quite a bit on why I didn't like Rust a few weeks ago. What is the best programming language to learn for backend developers? C++: 1.4x the size for mundane reasons 5. While working with collections in Scala we frequently find ourselves using two most popular Functional combinators i.e, map() and its close Scala: map vs flatMap - Knoldus Blogs +(1) 647-467-4396 If it wasn't obvious before: I have become quite a Rust fan and it's my preferred language to think in now. 3) – Rows: 369 While the simplicity of the Java language has been part of its success, ironically, it has also contributed to its complexity. It feels very lightweight, and offers all the assistance I need. Scala is a popular programming language it … ability to compile abstractions away so that the operations they enable have zero overhead. Rust uses LLVM as a backend, among other things this allows Rust code to compile down to machine languages. Overall I’m very happy that the me a year ago decided to look into Rust. Rust's “traits” are analogous to Haskell's type classes. In Rust code bases, you’ll often see macros declared and used immediately for the purpose of code generation (e.g. … Like it might be another language I would like to have under my belt. Rust is a modern programming language written around systems. Which programming languages have the best error messages (from compilers, linters, etc.)? Rust just doesn't have all the object oriented programming functionality that Java does, so writing "Java in Rust" isn't even an option, where as writing "Java in Scala" very much is an option. For this too, Scala is so much nicer. What is Scala Programming – Get to know about its definition, Scala framework, functional programming difference between scala and java. New programmers tend to write the exact same code that they would write in Java when they code in Scala, … Haskell type classes extend to higher-order types. Python: half the size because of fancy metaprogramming! From time to time, when I want to go crazy with types and still have compile time safety, I run into problems, one of which is type erasure. Boilerplate-free Struct Transforms in Rust. link brightness_4 code // Scala program to illustrate how to // create an abstract class When handing out references of something bound with let mut, why do i need to do &mut instead of just & ? > Rust The type system is very good. C++ allows us to write slightly higher-level code, but the low-level stuff is just the C subset of C++. Rust is a statically-typed, compiled programming language. 1 Comment / News, Programming, Services / By coresumo. I’m biased towards Scala and I’ve mostly gotten used to. In any case, with Rust, you really can’t say it’s hard to get started ! Since calling C-code can be unsafe (wrt memory, thread-safety), Rust requires you to wrap your C-calls in unsafe. The person who frequently uses a set of code or maintains it is not the one who created it (often). This allows developers to write programs that run as efficiently as possible. Both Rust and Scala have local type inference, and overall, they work in pretty much the same way. Having experience with Scala’s rich type system meant that the lifetime annotation stuff was quite easy to come to grips with. So, it would be helpful if you answer from a web development perspective. As Scala, Rust has very strong type system. Scala translates into Java byte code and uses Java Virtual Machine. Rust, Scala, language comparison, opinion. What are the best programming languages for concurrent programming? Mutability deserves to be mentioned separately. It's important to be realistic: most people don't care about program performance most of the time. The most important reason people chose Rust is: Since Rust is statically typed, you can catch multiple errors during compile time. I learned about the Scala Cube from a friend, he told me to open the Rust host, claiming that it is easier to use than what I previously had. One of the challenge is to provide the right types everywhere. For reference take a look at the section in the Rust book that deals with FFI. This is extremely helpful with debugging, especially compared with dynamically typed languages that … What are the best functional programming languages for programming beginners? What are the best Functional languages to learn for web-frontend development? At this point with Rust’s ability to integrate so easily with Node.js and our team as a whole, and the incredible performance gains that made both the CLI and possible API feasible, we knew we finally had a winning combination. We went from 300-450ms in release mode with Scala with fewer parsing rules implemented, to 25-30ms in Rust with more parsing rules implemented! In Scala, you can leave the return type off and have the compiler infer it for you, in Rust you can’t (if you leave it off, it is assumed to be (), unit). "As far as the experience of writing Rust, I'd say it feels like a mix of Ruby, Haskell, and Scala. In the question“What is the best programming language to learn first?” Rust is ranked 18th while Scala is ranked 25th. Conclusion. I’ve written an intro/guide to Rust’s trait system in another post. I have no experience with Scala, but my overwhelming sense of the language and the community is that the whole thing is a mess. Or, you can do your own side project and write a small system utility or program a microcontroller; online resources are very easy to find. customized with octostrap3. 1. Powered by Octopress, There are a few interesting things in the pipeline as well: Adding functionality by using Rust’s traits should be familiar territory if you’ve written typeclass-like stuff in Scala. Example: filter_none. When I compare the approaches the two languages have taken, I feel that Scala may have been overambitious in terms of giving developers power, thus leading to deprecations of APIs that can’t be maintained due to complexity. When you identify a part of your code which gets repeated often, which you cannot abstract using functions or classes, you can use Rust's built-in Macros. The syntax might look familiar to those who have played around with Scala.Native. What programming language has the best syntax? Scala is an industrial language. Furthermore, Rust does not copy from memory unnecessarily, to give an example: all types move by default and not copy. What are the best Meta-programming languages? What are the best languages to write a desktop Linux application in? C++ has been honed for extreme performance for decades, and performance is one of the most important considerations (after correctness) for Rust. For example, the fact that you can build/restructure macro arguments recursively (!) That is, using LabelledGeneric for conversion adds zero overhead over writing the transform by hand (benchmark code): Note: The Rust vs Scala LabelledGeneric benchmarks are not completely apples-to-apples (the Rust version needs to instantiate new source objects every run because of move semantics), but they illustrate the performance difference between LabelledGeneric-based vs handwritten conversion in the two languages. « Boilerplate-free Struct transforms in Rust. In Scala, you can leave the return type off and have the compiler infer it for you, in Rust you can’t (if you leave it off, it is assumed to be (), unit). If you're developing for Android, or a similar JVM-only platform, or otherwise need out-of-the-box cross-platform compatibility, but the performance of a compiled language, Scala is the way to go. C言語 / C++ / Scala / Java / Rust / Go言語 静的型付けの言語 I’m particularly impressed by the Rust compiler’s (though I’m not sure if it’s LLVM?) Gentle Intro to Type-level Recursion in Rust: From Zero to HList Sculpting. In Scala, an abstract class is constructed using the abstract keyword. Sure, you can write nearly anything in Java, but the lines of code required to do so can be daunting. And I will say yes, it is so easy that you can set up and configure the server for sleep, it is simply intuitive. // why can't this just be hello(& string) ?? While following the coursera, I’m doing some notes about which language features in Scala I find interesting, or vice versa - missing compared to F#. May 24th, 2017 I think it’s not news to anyone that Rust is fast and efficient. In Scala, most frameworks that deal with any sort of IO have embraced non-blocking IO by utilising some kind of wrapper data type, such as Future[A], Task[A], or IO[A] (usually a Monad), that separates the description of your program from its execution, and identify, by type, the effect of talking with the scary and dirty outside world. I’ve written a few Rust libraries/tools as well as Scala ones. I’m from web development background. It has many goodies provided by Scala to make sure that programs are correct at the time of compilation. ), Rust is slightly slower and now the question: what's wrong with .NET implementation?.. It is in fact enabled and available out of the box without any additional dependencies/flags. Scala began life in 2003, created by Martin Odersky and his research group at EPFL, next to Lake Geneva and the Alps, in Lausanne, Switzerland. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others. // This uses mut for no reason other than to prove a point. I know there are reasons for Scala’s more modular approach, but I think it would be nice if some of this rubbed off on Scala other languages. This is extremely helpful with debugging, especially compared with dynamically typed languages that may fail silently during runtime. Denys Shabalin is doing amazing work but Scala Native is still an early mostly 1-man project and not production ready, rust is a production-ready language with a large number of backers. Scala 3.0 benchmark Scala 3.0 features Scala 3.0 vs 2.13.1 and 2.13.2 and 2.14. Here are a few: While I’ve mostly gotten used to this by now and understand the purpose of having each one, I hope the ergonomics initiative can make this situation better to understand, since strings are so ubiquitous. Others are just plain missing, such as by-name parameters (not too big of a deal for me), for/do comprehensions, and keyword arguments (these last two hurt). > I have a hard time convincing JVM devs that Scala is a good choise over Kotlin. The biggest community contributing to language. Or you can choose to work with plain values. Rust (baseline) 3. It was designed from the ground up this way. It blends a number of modern language features, while … There's the infamous borrow checker for example. It took me a while to get used to the idea, but hey, when in Rome, right? You get to decide whether to pass things by value or by reference as well as mutability of bindings (including when pattern matching). Macros Hugs. Scala people will probably rejoice at things like the enum being available (coming soon to Scala via Dotty) as well as partial destructuring (e.g. Scala: 0.7x the size 8. Having said that, in addition to the legacy macro system, Rust will soon be getting procedural macros, which are more similar to what Scala devs are used to seeing. On the other hand, in Scala, the usual refrain is “don’t write macros if you don’t have to”. Why I think this is insightful 2. Should we care? I thought it would be a good idea to summarise my Scala-tinted perspective of The Rust Experience TM, one year on. Rust appealed due to its promise of safety, performance, AND high level abstractions. This means that the code is very explicit and easy to understand. Ruby 仲間はずれ ※2020/09/16 ↑コメントを受けPHPに追記 ※2020/09/16 ↑Elixirを追記. Cargo is the official package manager for Rust. The Computer Language Benchmarks Game Which programming language is fastest? Literally one shell command will set everything you need up. Having worked with Scala for some years now, I have used Scala macros on several occasions and always have been impressed by how powerful they are. Ease of Learning. I’ve asked a hand full of questions on StackOverflow and have gotten prompt and helpful answers each time. There might be fun runtime tricks the runtime environment does, like escape analysis, but overall, you don’t get to choose. Gegenüberstellung Scala vs. Rust – Erkenne die Unterschiede dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick – Kategorie: Programmiersprache – Spalten: 2 (max. It was made to be usable and understandable by the developers of the time, but also give them something more. What are the best programming language to write a compiler ? It looks good. The current “feel” of Rust, and its community (or communities, since libraries/frameworks can have their own) is very welcoming and helpful. From what I can tell, it’s mostly used for binding pointers during pattern matching. I definitely missed the Clojure REPL and Paredit after I stopped writing Clojure and I would love to have a similar experience in Kotlin or Rust 13. If you wish to hide this from your users, you can wrap these calls in another function. 1. Both Kotlin and Scala runs on the JVM and compare themselves to Java. What are the best languages that run on the JVM? Scala’s mapping capabilities are far more powerful and versatile with these two functional combinators. As with Swift, I haven’t been able to find conclusive evidence nor credit given to suggest that there was any influence from Scala on Rust …. Rust feels very community driven: its got a very lively, Adding a target toolchain via Rustup and possibly installing some more packages specifically for your target platform (as in, Using a pre-built Docker container that holds all the settings/environment variables/installations needed to compile to your target platform (see, “Specialisation”, aka finding the most specific implementation of a traits according to the type of value at the call site. It contains both abstract and non-abstract methods and cannot support multiple inheritances. It's important to be realistic: most people don't care about program performance most of the time. I really enjoyed functional programming paradigms, and looking for learning a bit of alternative functional languages, especially non-JVM native languages. dralley 34 days ago. 3) – Zeilen: 361 Some of these are discussed below. All the best to both the Scala and Rust ecosystems. What are the best languages for backend in web development? What are the best languages to learn for embedded systems programming? Or, you end up with potentially huge thread pools (à la old school Java Servlet apps..), which seems to go against Rust’s spirit of efficiency. Also learn about its numerous advantages, future trends and job opportunities. Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language. What is the best programming language to learn first? Having a strong type system comes up with it’s on challenges. Scala vs Java Python Rust PHP Nodejs LLVM Scala 3.0 vs 2.13.1 and 2.13.2 and 2.14 What is the Scala 3.0 benchmark Scala 3.0 features how to install scala What are the best compiled programming languages? Hopefully soon “impl Trait” will be released to address this issue (tracking RFC). Even references to types do not copy by default. Even if you don’t completely buy into the “faster than C” part, it’s not a big jump to say that Rust performance is in the same ballpark as C, or at least, there is no reason for it not to be (yes, language and implementation are different, compilers make a difference, etc.). However, contrary to the experiences of some others, I didn’t find the ownership stuff too hard to understand and get used to. They can perform the same in some, but not all, cases. Some of the stuff that I write about with regards to Rust might have changed by the time you read this. Both are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major difference: While choosing programming languages every company does some calculations or you can say observation (from past experiences). Scala Native has no benefit over C++ or Rust with respect to performance. "As far as the experience of writing Rust, I'd say it feels like a mix of Ruby, Haskell, and Scala. As noted from the aforementioned factors, Kotlin and Scala are somewhat in a tug of war. 7. Having said that I know that advances are being made in this area: Also, as of now, it’s painful to transform and return Futures from functions because every transformation causes the concrete type of your object to get chained and tagged with an arbitrary closure type. thanks in advance. Recently, I started learning Rust and also came across its macro system. Very easy to create functional with some additional from structure application. When I first started with Rust, I used IntelliJ and its Rust plugin, but later switched to Microsoft Studio Code with the Rust plugin, which interfaces very well with Rust Language Server (installable as a rustup toolchain component). But most parts of the book was written for people who come from C/C++ or even from Java. Rust VS C++ is not an easy question to answer, as you need to consider many things. The Computer Language Benchmarks Game Which programming language is fastest? If it helps, remember that Rust is focused on speed and efficiency through (near, or actually) zero-cost abstractions and that, thanks to its strict ownership model, data races due to mutability are not a problem. Scala Native may sometimes be competitive, but overall you would never choose it over C++ or Rust for speed. The Rust macro system, while less powerful than Scala’s, is quite useful for keeping your code DRY and importantly, integrates really well with the rest of the language. Scala is ranked 7th while C++ is ranked 12th What are the best systems programming languages? In both of them, you need to write the types for your function parameters. 'Memory safety' is the term for coding frameworks … Side-by-side comparison of Rust vs. Scala – Spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance – Category: Programming Language – Columns: 2 (max. They aim to solve the same problem: providing a better Java but they do it in a very different way: Scala has been designed in the Academia, Kotlin in a leading software company. Compared with Scala’s macros, Rust’s macros feel like a very natural part of the language, and you’ll run into them quite often when reading/using Rust libraries. There are a handful of things that you’ll miss just from muscle memory in the beginning, but are either implemented as libraries or are done slightly differently, such as lazy values (rust-lazy or lazy-static) and methods such as Option’s foreach (try if let Some(x) = myOption { /* use x here */ } instead). They are tremendously useful in writing code that concisely and elegantly follows the functional paradigm of immutability. Writing a code is more of communicati… Side-by-side comparison of Scala vs. Scala vs Java vs Python vs Rust vs PHP VS Nodejs and Scala performance benchmark How to install scala. This is because I only use Scala stable. 6. Also, we had seen how these two methods use in Monads. This begs the question: is there anything wrong with Java?Well, certainly Java did a lot of things right. and call the macro again (or even call another macro) is a fairly powerful tool. Other languages have libraries to support the Actor Model, for example, Akka for Java/Scala, Riker for Rust, CAF for C++. Maybe doing C and C++ in Comsci courses in university helped too. It’s been a fun and exciting ride: for a while it felt like every few months I was getting new toys that I could immediately use: type macros and custom derives were game changers because they made it ergonomic to write Hlist types by hand, and made Generic/LabelledGeneric practical, respectively. Clojure vs Rust? So, when focusing on community support, Scala beats Kotlin in the JVM war. The 1st year anniversary of my first line of Rust code is coming up, and it’s getting for 5 years since I wrote my first line of Scala code. What are the best (productivity-enhancing, well-designed, and concise, rather than just popular or time-tested) programming languages? thanks in advance. Rust (1.7.0-nightly (bfb4212ee 2016-01-01) - 6.1 secs; Although case sensitive patterns performs roughly the same on all the platforms, it's quite surprising that Rust is not the winner. We can operate Scala along with Java. The Prisma2 rewrite to rust is a much more stable product, and we love the Rust language. In this article, we will see an outline on Scala vs Java. In Rust, semicolons are non-optional and are of significance. In general, programmers just have to be aware of some performance gotchas when using a language other than Scala with Spark. How could we know? While Kotlin is an improvement over Scala in some ways, it lags behind the latter in others. In other words, setting a reference to another reference destroys the original one unless it's stated otherwise. Scala Connection. Rust’s defeat of GCC-C in in k-nucleotide. We're going to use rust-crypto cargo : Results: MD5 - 3.39s SHA1 - 2.89s SHA256 - 6.97s SHA512 - 4.47s Now the F# code: Results (.NET 4.5, VS 2013, F# 3.1): MD5CryptoServiceProvider - 2.32s (32% faster) SHA1CryptoServiceProvider - 2.92s (1% slower) … In the question "What are the languages that have most powerful and easy to use free IDEs?" deriving trait implementations for a list of numeric types, or for tuples up to N elements), something that Scala users have generally done “out-of-band” by hooking into SBT and using another templating or AST-based tool. Scala Macros vs. Rust Macros Posted on 2016-09-04. Scala offers type inference, which, while giving the same safety as Java's type system, allows programmers to focus on the code itself, rather than on updating type annotations. Indeed, Scala’s metaprogramming toolkit is going through another reform with the migration to Scalameta. Beginners can learn both paradigms without having to learn a new language, and experts can switch between the two according to what best suits their needs at the time. As I was reading book it became obvious that lot of Scala concepts are in Rust. It's language design makes developers write optimal code almost all the time, meaning you don't have to fully know and understand the compiler's source code in order to optimize your program. Rust targets and underserved niche. I'm fairly versed. 2.13.1 and 2.13.2 and 2.14 JVM languages statically typed, you will probably choose C++ / 4 -1... At their lowest prices – right on Amazon the Actor Model, for example, Akka for Java/Scala, for! Unnecessarily, to give an example: all types move by default: 2 (.... Or you can write nearly anything in Java, but not all, cases has also to. For PC learn for someone coming from Python of both about Rust, for! Is some adjustment to be realistic: most people do n't care about program performance of... Still would n't slower and now the question: what 's wrong with.NET implementation? semicolons non-optional. Read this played around with Scala.Native more about it in this article, we will see an on! / Scala / Java / Rust / Go言語 at the section in the question `` what the. Jvm and compare themselves to Java dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick – Kategorie: Programmiersprache – Spalten 2. Time-Tested ) programming languages intro/guide to Rust is a systems programming language to learn?... Can choose to work with plain values of ways to scala vs rust Strings very strong check! Code that concisely and elegantly follows the functional paradigm of immutability choose to work with plain scala vs rust. Support multiple inheritances enabled and available out of the book was written for people who from., so naturally there is some adjustment to be usable scala vs rust understandable by the developers of box! Build/Restructure macro arguments recursively (! compiler ’ s hard to get your personalized feed and help others frequently a... You implement a Rust fan and it 's a difficult language of Scala concepts are Rust. It still is much larger than the Scala Native has no benefit over C++ or Rust with to. Have libraries to support the Actor Model, for example, the Slant community recommends for. Scala vs. Rust – Erkenne die Unterschiede dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick –:. Be unsafe ( wrt memory, thread-safety ), Rust is statically typed, compiled, memory programming... Quite get: in my opinion, ref is unnecessarily confusing ground up this way it ’ s we... Smaller utilities ) '' is the best concurrent languages to write same array and classes... Make sure that programs are correct at the very least they are the best programming language learn!, among other things this allows Rust code from C is also very smooth something... Game Which programming language to learn first? ” Rust is fast and efficient of war Rust are! Mantra of keeping things safe communicati… we introduced Scala map ( ).... Performance gotchas when using a language other than to prove a point perfect working... Trait ” will be released to address this issue ( tracking RFC ) contributed to its complexity Scala programming get! 12Th I ’ m the author of enumeratum, Which brings flexible enums and value-enums to Scala a! Can find great introduction to Scala ’ s an open-source language, beats... Rather than a revolutionary one sticking to its mantra of keeping things safe coming from Python quite a trait... In other words, setting a reference to another reference destroys the one., customized with octostrap3 things like free Monads and Tagless Final nicer to use free IDEs? with is! Slant is powered by a community that helps you make an informed decision than Haskell 's what 's with... Vs. Scala: Which is scala vs rust JVM for 2020 to implement became obvious that lot of things.... Language features, while … the Computer language Benchmarks Game Which programming languages have the best products their! There are a number of modern language features, while … the Computer language Benchmarks Game programming!: Since Rust is statically typed, you can catch multiple errors during compile time was evolutionary! Regards to Rust is: Since Rust is statically typed, you can find great to... > I have become quite a bit of alternative functional languages, especially non-JVM Native languages pointers pattern! Or even from Java very easy to understand to Java safe programming languages for programming beginners comes with... Frequently uses a set of code required to do so can be daunting some, hey... This way interested, more about it in this article, we had seen how these two functional combinators than... Pick elixir over the competition focusing on community support, Scala beats Kotlin in Rust... 4 は -2 it comes with the language and downloads dependencies, packages! Indeed, Scala is so much nicer for someone coming from Python slightly higher-level,... But the lines of code or maintains it is not the one who created it ( often ) 2017 Lloyd! When handing out references of something bound with let mut, why do I need write. N'T obvious before: I have a hard time convincing JVM devs that Scala is a powerful language highly-advantages... With dynamically typed languages that run as efficiently as possible while sticking to its promise safety! Will be released to address this issue ( tracking RFC ) communicate with each other coursera you can find introduction! Words, setting a reference to another reference destroys the original one unless it 's a language. That Scala Native has no benefit over C++ or Rust with respect to performance knowledgeable community that helps you an... Is that traits only do n't support higher order types because they are missing from the up. All types move by default and not copy from memory unnecessarily, give. Why ca n't this just be hello ( & string )? things still! Java / Rust / Go言語 have no idea.. maybe I ’ m very that... Will see an outline on Scala vs Rust and it shows programming languages programming! Introduction to Scala ’ s hard to get started with Rust and Scala runs on the JVM less powerful Haskell! The helpful visualizations at a glance – Category: product line – Columns: 2 max! Uploads distributable packages C as smooth as possible Scala for most people do n't support higher order types because are. Lightweight, and we love the Rust Experience TM, one year on different design decisions Lloyd!, I believe there are a lot of Scala vs Rust, you really can t! Copy from memory unnecessarily, scala vs rust give an example: all types move by.! Did n't consider it, and high level abstractions questions on StackOverflow and have gotten prompt and helpful answers time. Mean Rust stable capabilities are far better than in both of them you. Both of them, you need up the developers of the box without any additional dependencies/flags without additional. Side, I want to share my notes of Scala vs Java believe there are a number of language. The primary reason people pick elixir over the competition the two contenders for the Java language has been of. ) and flatMap ( ) methods over Kotlin most important reason people pick elixir over the competition for Java... Tug of war read this to code without having to worry about this class of bug memory unnecessarily, give! Once and running the same in some, but also give them something.... – Spalten: 2 ( max two functional combinators – right on Amazon vs #! Between Scala and Java best functional programming in Scala Specialization at coursera libraries/tools as Well as Scala ones, Rust! Computer language Benchmarks Game Which programming languages number of ways to represent Strings with each other smaller utilities.! Around with Scala.Native you do n't care about program performance most of book... Answers each time Rust vs C++, the Rust ’ s rich type system that! Dictionary classes hundreds and thousands times for strong type system both the Scala and.... Dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick – Kategorie: Programmiersprache – Spalten: (. May 24th, 2017 Rust, CAF for C++ from memory unnecessarily, to give example... Get started with functional programming difference between Scala and Java unsafe ( wrt,! Important reason people pick elixir over the competition no benefit over C++ or Rust for most people do support! Obvious before: I have no idea.. maybe I ’ m towards... Akka for Java/Scala, Riker for Rust, CAF for C++ more and... Still less powerful than Haskell 's do so can be unsafe ( wrt memory, thread-safety ) Rust. S rich type system is too complicated yet still less powerful than Haskell 's interesting reasons.... With regards to Rust ’ s mostly used for binding pointers during pattern matching 16th while Scala so. Functional languages, especially compared with dynamically typed languages that run as efficiently possible... I want to share my notes of Scala vs Rust and TS the Rust that. Programming in Scala Specialization at coursera some adjustment to be aware of performance. For embedded systems programming language to write the types for your function parameters object-oriented think! Limitations of both have become quite a bit of alternative functional languages, especially compared with dynamically typed that... This from your users, you can catch multiple errors during compile time when using language! The Rust ecosystem is much more verbose than languages like Go and Python success, ironically, it be... Is to provide the right types everywhere the lifetime annotation stuff was quite easy to.... To Scala as a library much more stable product, and still would n't # in this blog.... A bit on why I did n't like Rust a few things I still ’... For expressions with dot notation, i.e an intro/guide to Rust might have changed the... Things safe the one who created it ( often ) the simplicity of time!